Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54921 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88910 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2011 09:16:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Aug 2011 09:16:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:51355] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9E/E2-06524-0D2165E4 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 05:16:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDA73DE13E; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:15:57 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:15:57 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky To: Stas Malyshev cc: David Soria Parra , "internals@lists.php.net" In-Reply-To: <4E556A0B.4010406@sugarcrm.com> Message-ID: References: <4E556A0B.4010406@sugarcrm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: > On 8/24/11 2:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote: > > > > after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on > > the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be > > explained in more detail, let me know. > > I'm not sure choosing DCVS by vote is actually a good way to go here. > I think we need much more input from people that maintain all the > infrastructure we're using now and would be doing the move. If we > don't have people committed to making it happen majority-based vote is > useless IMHO. I agree, and I also think that before people can make a choice they need to have played with all the options. Just picking "git" because that's what you heard of and what all the fan boys like is *not* the correct way to go. In order to make a choice, and even consider switching away from SVN, something that *works* just fine, you need to know the systems (ie, git and hg). cheers, Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug