Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54902
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E556A0B.4010406@sugarcrm.com>
References: <slrnj5appg.6vi.dsp@experimentalworks.net>
	<4E556A0B.4010406@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:01:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6YZB7VeEPeP+yk2P3h4id=TyTgmOQon+rsLRm_sbAsxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: David Soria Parra <dsp@php.net>, "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system
 for PHP
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wr=
ote:
> Hi!
>
> On 8/24/11 2:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote:
>>
>> Hi Internals,,
>>
>> after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on
>> the DVCS RFC. =A0If you think something is missing or should be explaine=
d
>> in more detail, let me know.
>
> I'm not sure choosing DCVS by vote is actually a good way to go here. I
> think we need much more input from people that maintain all the
> infrastructure we're using now and would be doing the move. If we don't h=
ave
> people committed to making it happen majority-based vote is useless IMHO.

It is the same for everything, that does not make the vote useless.

About people maintaining our infrastructure, not much actually
maintains svn, and that won't change anything if we move to something
(except easiness) from a backup&co pov.

And unlike the last time we switched to another VCS, this time we will
have a clear decision process :)

--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org