Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54896 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5365 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2011 21:19:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Aug 2011 21:19:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dsoria@gmx.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dsoria@gmx.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.net designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dsoria@gmx.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.165.64.23 mailout-de.gmx.net Received: from [213.165.64.23] ([213.165.64.23:59414] helo=mailout-de.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BE/D2-24735-9CA655E4 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:19:06 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2011 21:19:02 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-067-187-136.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO [192.168.178.44]) [88.67.187.136] by mail.gmx.net (mp063) with SMTP; 24 Aug 2011 23:19:02 +0200 X-Authenticated: #235172 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+ArqFA3Q2A5lFKSsNVjoOuHHrg7bWN70g2h8raE4 O7GFepL4WhN2Wp Message-ID: <4E556AC0.5070706@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:18:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stas Malyshev CC: David Soria Parra , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4E556A0B.4010406@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: <4E556A0B.4010406@sugarcrm.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP From: dsoria@gmx.net (David Soria Parra) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/24/2011 11:15 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > On 8/24/11 2:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote: >> Hi Internals,, >> >> after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting >> on the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be >> explained in more detail, let me know. > > I'm not sure choosing DCVS by vote is actually a good way to go here. > I think we need much more input from people that maintain all the > infrastructure we're using now and would be doing the move. If we > don't have people committed to making it happen majority-based vote > is useless IMHO. Sure. I wrote the RFC because I plan to implement it. I will make it possible for either Git or Mercurial, but as stated, I prefer doing it with Mercurial. The vote is not a 100% we do it, but rather a: we would like to have it that way. So if people choose Bazaar, someone has to come up with a solution. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOVWrAAAoJEAT0aMuPE7Z1W0EQAK59Xw/gvwLI4qhR7pZ/kuJQ d4+Qs3wP2jipZUtq+6STvZdPD1Yf9PgyM9O+nshF73VtM91gY259CQ62QrDIE/6X mKes7T+3WWdQoEbKPCBA2uYiriVT2feS9DpiZnkz8oarXgFwRy+iryEeLGxCSovt Swy0xvpM1V6zt1ZxgYMhQDKF3eJCd7K6DctKyNScwzqH2N41HFnR/bhk1ZOT172B e/qXy3Bw0k3jo6khq2bjPlAID1yecmVuHjxtx5sxX/cTkyfrUWeYcUU49BIFRHa5 ZZe9JyfO2HcTi2+V5ni097Q2FYOOV7CuLdMaZqf26L0oZIttn+3CSNTcw+77cE98 aNB9+n1vkXPBuVpyz0mZz2/BYHpX4SjPHdgmmgZHlA9xz8RRbYypyK1TraoCiVOO 86utV3+TAsat+zl4hkvbtLap0VO6/9/XuFLdkKzhjMpP+8LkXo/5/supP2oyoYrP rHNyvdiH8gV6fQQyXoikSxYaCtLrAVwoC6mc8OIIQsiT0INkB5tP5g9hbuh+uxO2 nFT5qgYDhkXbNDYG7qHFGH29ijjARcer0NYekUtnZvViC3PGQ4vEZhDvjcis8uDr LrqzD3surZJX4CLUF0i13TKiNS9S8s/orV9zdI93I18gFXf6wAPPUZJUXVLsgSic +Gir6bAS7NVZs73KtoFL =5Hhp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----