Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54894 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2940 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2011 21:16:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Aug 2011 21:16:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.203 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.203 smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.203] ([67.192.241.203:37230] helo=smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5C/42-24735-11A655E4 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:16:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 65FD91B8379; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:15:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp10.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 3EA4D1B8359; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:15:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E556A0B.4010406@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:15:55 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Soria Parra CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 8/24/11 2:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote: > Hi Internals,, > > after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on > the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be explained > in more detail, let me know. I'm not sure choosing DCVS by vote is actually a good way to go here. I think we need much more input from people that maintain all the infrastructure we're using now and would be doing the move. If we don't have people committed to making it happen majority-based vote is useless IMHO. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227