Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54754 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12246 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2011 14:21:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Aug 2011 14:21:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danielc@analysisandsolutions.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danielc@analysisandsolutions.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain analysisandsolutions.com from 166.84.1.89 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danielc@analysisandsolutions.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 166.84.1.89 mailbackend.panix.com Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [166.84.1.89] ([166.84.1.89:48368] helo=mailbackend.panix.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E3/A4-59369-674115E4 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:21:43 -0400 Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EB4340EA for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:21:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by panix3.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 14662) id 5E56B8FDDE; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:21:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:21:40 -0400 To: PHP Internals List Message-ID: <20110821142139.GA20933@panix.com> References: <4E510339.3000609@thelounge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E510339.3000609@thelounge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Failing Autotests / Bugs From: danielc@analysisandsolutions.com (Daniel Convissor) Hi Reindl: On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 03:08:09PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > This is my try to help badly prevent broken releases like > 5.3.7 in the future, 54 failing tests are way too much and > the XFAILED should be removed until they are working XFAIL's should stay, in my opinion. Their results go to the "EXPECTED FAILED TEST SUMMARY" so there's no confusion with stuff in the "FAILED TEST SUMMARY." > FAIL DateTime::diff() days -- spring type2 type2 [ext/date/tests/DateTime_days-spring-type2-type2.phpt] > FAIL DateTime::diff() days -- spring type2 type3 [ext/date/tests/DateTime_days-spring-type2-type3.phpt] > FAIL DateTime::diff() days -- spring type3 type2 [ext/date/tests/DateTime_days-spring-type3-type2.phpt] > FAIL DateTime::diff() days -- spring type3 type3 [ext/date/tests/DateTime_days-spring-type3-type3.phpt] > FAIL DateTime::sub() -- dates [ext/date/tests/DateTime_sub-dates.phpt] > FAIL DateTime::sub() -- february [ext/date/tests/DateTime_sub-february.phpt] That's weird. Those are marked for XFAIL. How were you running the tests and on what checkout/code base? Also, it looks like you're reading from the main output list, not the various SUMMARY sections, which is totally inefficient because it lists passes, skips, etc, too. Thanks, --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409