Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54700
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E4D498F.9040408@sugarcrm.com>
References: <CAH-PCH5YvyBWfKomU0RaJw2E-GVqPXOV2TZMN9EURfQvYxu54w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E4C3D7D.3040606@googlemail.com>
	<4E4D498F.9040408@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:19:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH63fKzD-0Mk1De0a5SRURK=Af0Bw=ZsCKBy=GCVcA7gfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@googlemail.com>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Function autoloading through spl_autoload*
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wro=
te:
> Hi!
>
> On 8/17/11 3:15 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
>>
>> However, in my opinion the important part is to just make a decision the
>> sooner, the better, as long as there are not too much creepy code out
>> there (I don't know any and I can't imagine, that there is). Because
>> functions with namespace are quite unhandy without autoloading and I
>> don't think, that there is much use of it.
>
> We already made the decision, when we introduced the namespaces and made =
the
> resolution order what it is now. And we considered all the variants and
> discussed all the arguments brought here back then.

could you link the discussion about the function autoloading back then?
I only found the namespace resolution discussion, but nothing about
functions, except that they should fall back to the global namespace
as we don't have/didn't have autoloaders for them.


--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu