Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54696 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20109 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2011 17:27:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Aug 2011 17:27:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.123 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.123 smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.123] ([67.192.241.123:46047] helo=smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 61/B6-21097-19B4D4E4 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:27:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp22.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9134D1706A4; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:27:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp22.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 3EDD51703B8; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:27:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E4D4B8D.6090406@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:27:41 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Paul Dragoonis , PHP Internals List References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Activation of IGBinary serialization extension in 5.4 by default From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 8/18/11 5:22 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > . not enabling it by default defeats the purpose of bundling it Actually, I don't think it does. It's one thing to tell people "put this option into php.ini" and quite another is "download it from PECL (?), compile it (?!) and install it". The first is within the limits of any literate person, the second is sysadmin territory. > . easier to support it while being only in pecl ('do you use the core > version or latest pecl?") It is a concern, if this extension is not stable yet. Is it? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227