Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54589 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15520 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2011 18:26:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Aug 2011 18:26:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.183 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.183 smtp183.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.183] ([67.192.241.183:47443] helo=smtp183.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5C/D1-05730-053184E4 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:26:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B1C1D80C6; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:26:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp8.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 65185815B; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:26:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E48134E.4030708@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:26:22 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: PHP Internals References: <4E48121A.3090007@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: <4E48121A.3090007@sugarcrm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE]strn(case)cmp supporting a negative length as its third paramter From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! >> Maybe, but I would classify *that* as a bug as it makes no sense at all. Thinking more about it, something like: if(strncasecmp($filename, ".php", -4) === 0) { /* got php file! */ } seems to me just fine and better than doing the same with substr. I would definitely be against the warning in this case. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227