Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54548 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79650 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2011 18:21:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Aug 2011 18:21:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:55893] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F9/B0-07204-43F654E4 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:21:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5FDEF3C8379; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:21:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id DAE3A3C829D; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:21:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E456F2F.7030809@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:21:35 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lester Caine CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4E3F02E8.2050402@sugarcrm.com> <4E450EB1.6090502@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E450EB1.6090502@lsces.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP (or not). Call for Participation. From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 8/12/11 4:29 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > Actually the real question here is WHY create a fork on github at all? The copy Pull requests, for one. > you are working on LOCALLY is the fork that you are developing on? Much of the > stuff on github and the other DVCS server sites is redundant? You only need to I think you confusing "not absolutely required" and "redundant" :) Of course you could do without any infrastructure github provides. But it makes life so much easier. Especially when you are working in a team bigger than 1 person. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227