Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54547 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75811 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2011 17:51:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Aug 2011 17:51:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:55909] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E2/20-07204-A18654E4 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:51:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C296C3C8355; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:51:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id BCB583C840D; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:51:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E456815.8020303@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:51:17 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: "RQuadling@GMail.com" , David Soria Parra , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4E3F02E8.2050402@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP (or not). Call for Participation. From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 8/12/11 3:26 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > But you can't call it PHP anymore due to the license, where as with a > DCVS with people having forks on publically accessible repositories, > everybody is basically violating the license. Well, the license is something to think about, yes. > > I share Richard's concerns about finding out "what is the real one"/best > one/latest one. This however I don't see how it's a concern. How hard it is to remember git.php.net? How hard it is to know PHP's git repository is the main one? How it's different from what we have now? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227