Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54472 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66935 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2011 15:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Aug 2011 15:10:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.128 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.128 c2bthomr10.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.128] ([213.123.20.128:48107] helo=mail.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 82/B2-53378-47CFF3E4 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:10:45 -0400 Received: from host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com (EHLO _10.0.0.4_) ([81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr10.btconnect.com with ESMTP id DYJ60952; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:07:12 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E3FFB9F.9050303@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:07:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SUSE/2.0.14-2.2 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <4E3F0279.3070701@sugarcrm.com> <4E3FDE9E.9010409@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E3FDE9E.9010409@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0301.4E3FFB9F.0095, actions=tag X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.8.8.144221:17:7.586, ip=81.138.11.136, rules=__MOZILLA_MSGID, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_MAILTO, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1000_1099, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr10.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B020C.4E3FFC71.01E2:SCFSTAT14830815,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP (or not). Call for Participation. From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) David Muir wrote: > John Szakmeister, who is a Subversion developer himself, has a good > comparison of svn, hg, bzr and git: > http://www.szakmeister.net/blog/2011/feb/17/choosing-new-version-control-system/ > > Long story short, his company went with git. Makes good reading ... many other comparisons are now getting long in the tooth, and so don't cover the current playing field. Still it looks like 'best of a bad job' rather than 'this wins hands down' and does make a fair comparison of all the current problems, but I think the fact that he has not investigated submodules may actually negate their final results :( This was the main area that I needed to work well, but is still work in progress everywhere? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php