Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54313 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98200 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2011 12:49:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Aug 2011 12:49:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=landeholm@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=landeholm@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: landeholm@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.173 mail-iy0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.173] ([209.85.210.173:41390] helo=mail-iy0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C4/13-11280-AC3493E4 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:49:15 -0400 Received: by iyk2 with SMTP id 2so369154iyk.18 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:49:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hh1tCxMV+iaPv06QxNQDqMwC1vmHhtlunXZ6ga20+TU=; b=uAEyskSwrrE2vQFuN37d/g1hdB+Cf/7NzOI2yor9lcfZYCV+ngtjJ56Ros42vXgqi7 EyVEdhBrlxYkM8UrfOsSfuYRryW02zosRNDFBKi/cwFT3AiT6DrSohuemnmVEeZ3O3Ox 7FOpZsekLOzugYrZhLQJhxqOYINxN6YfL51lM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.144 with SMTP id b16mr255874ibl.71.1312375751209; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.37.129 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 05:49:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E3898B0.40809@sugarcrm.com> <4E38EC0C.9080304@lerdorf.com> <4E38FA2E.4030605@lsces.co.uk> <4E38FC67.9090200@toolpark.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:49:10 +0200 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Weak References From: landeholm@gmail.com (Hannes Landeholm) Good idea. I will see what I can do when I get time. ~Hannes On 3 August 2011 12:32, Pierre Joye wrote: > hi Hannes, > > I would suggest to still update the RFC with the various very > instructive comments and example use cases you use in this thread. > Doing the same in the long run should help as well to understand the > goals, implementations, etc., for the pecl users or for the 2nd > attempt to get it in the core, if still desired. > > Cheers, > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Hannes Landeholm wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We had a healthy discussion around WR and I have been able to express >> my concerns. The consensus is clearly to put it in a PECL extension so >> I think this discussion should move on to the practical matters of >> doing this. I suggest aborting the vote and changing the RFC state to >> something like "Transfered to PECL". >> >> ~Hannes >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > > > > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >