Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54311 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81323 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2011 10:32:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Aug 2011 10:32:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.42 mail-gw0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.83.42] ([74.125.83.42:44436] helo=mail-gw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 90/90-11280-3D3293E4 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:32:52 -0400 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so397924gwb.29 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 03:32:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8zql+fhU/uCqbJDZ7dVQlMnnnyLfsWqSzG0UT6Bgj2E=; b=ItiaELWu1Sx3zuUkcUif+hDvg4aRV4ESVyijvwZv+TXVUh949/JG685khSyNyB8HtX fBIAvIdXFlGX5Rg3kLVPVTLi5T+eWDuhtjJzPNDhra8APrT0dpGrqvNN++KkXzgSgSMh nO27TC1BLmj/LgIcBudPZ/E70Z/DOk4V5SFgM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.176.226 with SMTP id b62mr3665858yhm.181.1312367567797; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 03:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.169.17 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 03:32:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E3898B0.40809@sugarcrm.com> <4E38EC0C.9080304@lerdorf.com> <4E38FA2E.4030605@lsces.co.uk> <4E38FC67.9090200@toolpark.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:32:47 +0200 Message-ID: To: Hannes Landeholm Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Weak References From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Hannes, I would suggest to still update the RFC with the various very instructive comments and example use cases you use in this thread. Doing the same in the long run should help as well to understand the goals, implementations, etc., for the pecl users or for the 2nd attempt to get it in the core, if still desired. Cheers, On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Hannes Landeholm wrote: > Hello, > > We had a healthy discussion around WR and I have been able to express > my concerns. The consensus is clearly to put it in a PECL extension so > I think this discussion should move on to the practical matters of > doing this. I suggest aborting the vote and changing the RFC state to > something like "Transfered to PECL". > > ~Hannes > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org