Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54305 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32105 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2011 01:31:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Aug 2011 01:31:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=landeholm@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=landeholm@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: landeholm@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.170 mail-iy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.170] ([209.85.210.170:45977] helo=mail-iy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F6/A0-28624-705A83E4 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:31:52 -0400 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so428666iym.29 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:31:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=agZC+Nmh2CWXM2oF22d3O25ChlSNUTZRVpoRUex83Pw=; b=JMGpmlvmGHwhjbjvKZFHX7BvQGL5SWJO6l/VnK8cJn2UdHD7Aud1pjQ3g/ZjBptkZk cBNWhQc0S6nBdFN1Ic7ZpR9jPKWQT40XAgV6dntFVRf7+AZTp1URAutTQtdJTP/Jmr7Y LuyfwV1R0IC8zrpJdAQnWphe8IxKgK816KzVM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.69.136 with SMTP id z8mr1714262ibi.21.1312335107691; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.37.129 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 18:31:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E3814C9.2020407@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 03:31:47 +0200 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Weak References From: landeholm@gmail.com (Hannes Landeholm) Tired... > I don't agree with the concept of putting new feature in PECL itself... should of course be: >I don't disagree with the concept of putting new feature in PECL itself... ~Hannes