Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54280 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7658 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2011 18:50:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Aug 2011 18:50:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=landeholm@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=landeholm@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: landeholm@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.42 mail-ww0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.42] ([74.125.82.42:58331] helo=mail-ww0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BE/D0-03148-C65F63E4 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:50:21 -0400 Received: by wwg11 with SMTP id 11so1985139wwg.5 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:50:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=byQckNouMChZ5UY75eB4ii2K85A6xAQg8YPPxQkgPPI=; b=X6H+aRkpOtkkt5hateZ+HsNSpZZHZ14vfIB15+hQrrEdCLv0Y/5X+DkjJiIT5rP03j m3kjS+JOyUii29pz4Ley7zYbt0W74Tw+i3btKtTb75Iy126Wcsgyd3VSOuUlrNO5OGkA aSy6qKn/Sla+f3RGApx7GNLpjU7mbrBn7Jp3w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.11.204 with SMTP id u12mr6508687wbu.8.1312224617648; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.134.5 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:50:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 20:50:17 +0200 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net, Adam Harvey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Weak References From: landeholm@gmail.com (Hannes Landeholm) Hello, I would just like to remind you that the voting will take place for 7 more days so there are still time to discuss your concerns. If you find something confusing or have objections I would be very interested in hearing them and discussing that _before_ you vote as I have reminded you twice now during the 2 week discussion period. Remember that people want this feature, so the least you can do is explain your objections before you vote no. Silently burying feature requests does not help anybody. aharvey: I'm surprised you voted no since you seemed content with the answers you got earlier. Do you have some special objection in mind? Cheers, ~Hannes