Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54228 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77648 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2011 09:56:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jul 2011 09:56:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ava3ar@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ava3ar@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ava3ar@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.46 mail-vw0-f46.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.46] ([209.85.212.46:60488] helo=mail-vw0-f46.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DA/E4-50004-B52313E4 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 05:56:48 -0400 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so1861744vws.19 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:56:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=lVd0B7PVEFju0OmwGz+PmlB/viqJUnflrKDKO3pYhn4=; b=wrT7VQc963zX1quaSiidOZnG4urIBh7GVf7rJwBqk7OnodBXD1+unSAmsn2skIh/bM Nlh68CmK099e297bq5T5uD4Mu2jrjxJrKToybqeRGDqXAsOcJLV44/k2HzYLJV0Z6uzY z6V++4ZT6m+JqVUuAr4CMjPqKVVhp3O3kPD4M= Received: by 10.220.181.205 with SMTP id bz13mr262523vcb.17.1311846996151; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:56:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.164.16 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:56:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a8d6348c2404a91e2ea9 Subject: 5.4 and safemode From: ava3ar@gmail.com (Keloran) --90e6ba53a8d6348c2404a91e2ea9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I noticed that in revision *313784 *it is checking for safemode/open basedir, but isn't safemode being dropped from 5.4 (if going by the RFC), since it was deprecated in 5.3 ?, unless im reading that wrong, or if not dropped, then wouldn't this check be moot anyway by having the main feature deprecated just a wonder --90e6ba53a8d6348c2404a91e2ea9--