Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54175 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77549 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2011 22:47:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2011 22:47:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.42 mail-vw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.42] ([209.85.212.42:49672] helo=mail-vw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/43-59700-79F4B2E4 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:47:52 -0400 Received: by vwl1 with SMTP id 1so2595978vwl.29 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:47:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=95V1ryCx/DBMBvCFT4hrrp+sjEM4Uy2NBt2kJXrH4Yk=; b=RxEzmV+WCIVTid7hjXXmm5wBUd6SSk2iCHhj9KQ7abjJQtWAcqDb6AoiVaMYMcHNCl 2m1ztaz9SKE1BNIF0O/22Ux//yB4jF/GONABvjJ5eJ7y0mekTFaRe0upkGCzlg8ahPgp SZpiKGKAUMn0QKEcl1Jn99UeH3ZraczRfWNvM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.167 with SMTP id v7mr2955177vdf.37.1311461267785; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.167.198 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:47:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E2AF3D4.9070704@daylessday.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 00:47:47 +0200 Message-ID: To: Gwynne Raskind , PHP Security Cc: RQuadling@gmail.com, Antony Dovgal , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] new gcov.php.net machine is up From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson) On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 00:36, Gwynne Raskind wrote: > Given the variety of warnings that pop up in a PHP build (and don't > even start me on the list thrown up by Clang's static analyzer!), it's > a major undertaking to eliminate all the warnings, and it'll get ugly. Exactly. And given the nature of PHP, using several dozen bucketloads of external libraries... it is isn't realistic to eliminate all random [irrelevant] compiler warnings. Couple of years ago I have vague memories of "homeland security" [usa] project, and several projects after that, offering various analyzes of php-src. I believe security@php.net receives such reports automatically (they had login credentials at least). Removing compiler warnings is (in a project like PHP) generally not a high priority, but again, if a trusted person commits such a patch.. I highly doubt it would get reverted. -Hannes