Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54052
Return-Path: <adam@adamharvey.name>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 25643 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2011 18:12:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2011 18:12:33 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.170 mail-iw0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.214.170] ([209.85.214.170:36524] helo=mail-iw0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 38/C0-08769-F87742E4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:12:32 -0400
Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so3573322iwn.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=adamharvey.name; s=google;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=wXk9GpTuLDCPsbYLkC2FDTK+M0HHuTs0VOGRlU0u2Wg=;
        b=FkD4/u5ZDpM+sOPyJIfTGKpLyR00MnVNyNn48qvlwzcv7f4hLGR5RmrGBSf8NYuB/3
         V3OGdwljiIfLanQWmT/8V2HicpQw+JZEyQluVgdh4415YOOtQL9aiQnFx0KpI0nmEd3+
         Osd8rOQeI+/EszyDcmMc4oK7LJLP7WpyS6bJg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.141.207 with SMTP id n15mr6239431ibu.72.1311012749533;
 Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
Received: by 10.231.168.71 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.168.71 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACs9DU5nEkFha+kKeWK3X7OvrdcFYPWMUUqOAXHzwYmKzwNy7Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACs9DU5nEkFha+kKeWK3X7OvrdcFYPWMUUqOAXHzwYmKzwNy7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:12:29 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fUZbPb8AIq0dugURCZ5dmMXFFgM
Message-ID: <CADajX4ARvzOi_mcJSEJDKjrETjbvQrCZM63MYM3LpygaLm3sJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hannes Landeholm <landeholm@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net, Etienne Kneuss <colder@php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64715ee3b625904a85bf17f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Weak References
From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey)

--0016e64715ee3b625904a85bf17f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Jul 18, 2011 9:20 AM, "Hannes Landeholm" <landeholm@gmail.com> wrote:
> In a nutshell: The RFC proposes adding a single class called "SplWeakRef"
> which provides the "Weak Reference" feature. This is the only change.

This may just be Monday morning fuzziness, or I've just missed something in
the RFC, but is there a reason weak references would be limited solely to
objects, rather than any variable that can be dealt with by-reference?

Thanks,

Adam

--0016e64715ee3b625904a85bf17f--