Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54030 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45721 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2011 09:45:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2011 09:45:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:40418] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 15/B5-08769-DB0042E4 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 05:45:40 -0400 Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so1300407gxk.29 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:45:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ui+J4Pc1/MSAKyHI4X98Yj3TxH//D6BxjzJ2xa0T2JA=; b=PB71+LDAzEaW1wELgpFFYDYHtVCnwb4FwZeSRFTgE+XAp7/ZvWB6hPBQsQhNm/zLoQ xA6jYRr8SZSW1icUUMXfQ5iQ3qXIYRtBSLJsUTuRn2NsUXdbydaG3l7KLpGWIqA8n24g v7V1xFBQU2TMiUrTHA30/GPRS+J8Jv400RVsI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.75.136 with SMTP id z8mr3623942yhd.47.1310982324673; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.137.11 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:45:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E22A697.2020900@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:45:24 +0200 Message-ID: To: Peter Cowburn Cc: Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Vote results From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote: > My meaning was simply that trying to explain what was being voted on, > after the vote has closed, is too late. I'm aware of the previous > discussions on the topic on this list. It has been explained dozen of times before the votes, that's what I'm trying to say :) -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org