Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53974 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44133 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2011 19:07:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Jul 2011 19:07:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.153 smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.153] ([67.192.241.153:46995] helo=smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 51/D2-17341-DEF802E4 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:07:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp15.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 255DA30011E; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:07:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp15.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id C57163003B7; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:07:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E208FE7.4020606@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:07:19 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Willbanks CC: PHP Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SplClassLoader From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 6/29/11 6:31 AM, Mike Willbanks wrote: >> >> There's a RFC covering this. There's a patch also. >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/splclassloader > > > This one seems to have fallen through the cracks? Well, nobody proposed it in time (especially not the RFC author :) > * The other implementation I could see is to modify spl_autoload to be able > to pass it a parameter for the auto loading type - right now it will attempt > to autoload everything lowercase (been brought up a few times). I think the class looks better. I think RFC needs to be expanded with description of what the class actually does and how, and then if there are no objections I think we could take it into 5.4.0, since the implementation already exists. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227