Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53942 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15914 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2011 19:24:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jul 2011 19:24:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.42 mail-gw0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.83.42] ([74.125.83.42:38865] helo=mail-gw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0A/F0-10669-901FD1E4 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:24:58 -0400 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so2887700gwb.29 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:24:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pBdpP1nhpwWdO86zT+6iTVqWxGR1LBX+a0GgGpuxxMo=; b=aHtWdcxVMUTFNg1GrkXblFnFnWZiGocYlcN4yPBx8iKbqRlsBgXQzvU31xTG+jhfq+ eOO9IYV7CMHopfJ+46dgnyU4/Q3cNr+P5W69Hz5OlEQSZKXw1xtTnw+TKlpgOS9zOYFp QRO7Jw3E20+qrX9ZVo2LYTsYRBd//ilmxo9n8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.53.19 with SMTP id b19mr1615058yba.37.1310585094992; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.137.11 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:24:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E1DEFB0.1010208@lerdorf.com> References: <4E1DDBB4.3070301@php.net> <4E1DE5A8.90505@lerdorf.com> <4E1DEFB0.1010208@lerdorf.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:24:54 +0200 Message-ID: To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Make primitive type names reserved words (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] 5.4 features for vote (long)) From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) ah forgot to mention that indeed not all todos should have be done via a RFC, that would not help us, not at all. But the primitive one, for example, must have one. On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On 07/13/2011 11:50 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> Are you saying that widely approved thing are pointless or we could >> have foreseen the results for each of them? Better to have a vote and >> got a massive support than nothing and sit in the middle of nowhere >> forever. > > I'm saying that many of these in the past were handled by a, "Hey guys, > any objections to adding E_STRICT to E_ALL in 5.4?" email which would > get a couple of, "go for it" replies and no objections, followed by the > change being committed. To me the voting is only needed when we have > trouble reaching a quick consensus and not for every little thing. > > -Rasmus > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org