Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53936 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4396 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2011 18:35:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jul 2011 18:35:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.210.170 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.170 mail-iy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.170] ([209.85.210.170:59453] helo=mail-iy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1F/C1-24992-475ED1E4 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:35:32 -0400 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so6414347iym.29 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.97.68 with SMTP id m4mr1460364icn.292.1310582128129; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.200.3] (c-50-131-46-20.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.131.46.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f19sm9040711ibl.66.2011.07.13.11.35.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E1DE5A8.90505@lerdorf.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:36:24 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Rasmus Lerdorf , Hannes Magnusson , David Soria Parra , internals@lists.php.net References: <4E1DDBB4.3070301@php.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Make primitive type names reserved words (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] 5.4 features for vote (long)) From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 07/13/2011 11:17 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> On 07/13/2011 10:30 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >>> I disagree and this exact issue shows that the voting and controlling >>> is actually working well, very well. As it is covered by the two >>> recently adopted RFCs. >> >> I'm not sure how you come to the conclusion that it is working well. >> This particular change is clearly not feasible for 5.4, yet the votes >> are 37-19 for doing it right now. > > Maybe read my reply in this exact thread? > > I said that due the BC problem, discovered or discussed later, forces > us to reject this RFC. What do you mean discovered or discussed later? Anybody who bothered to read the RFC should have seen the BC problem. It's not like it was hiding in small letters somewhere. And most of the other votes are unanimous which make them rather pointless as well. -Rasmus