Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53927 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81925 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2011 16:35:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jul 2011 16:35:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.42 mail-gw0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.83.42] ([74.125.83.42:49369] helo=mail-gw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 10/00-16314-669CD1E4 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:35:53 -0400 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so2801641gwb.29 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:35:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lsAgcpAKhxU2sjfxAyr5fpcbMOjRmGl8uNkxUBetBD8=; b=uzTmPKPFIGHM8eSFAPy8NQczgOFPAlyMrVqEoR5gqttIE9rprc9qC+ymY6hnpU7Mg2 wn5zXfnF7cwK73kiBGnm4rrymVx62BCOd+frLUlZHDrhKz4uKO7R+zD0QFcAr/ikTAYe OTKPKxH7xBNco2pSFOn3UyPZcoijIwtXrF6PE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.29.10 with SMTP id g10mr1550615ybj.56.1310574931038; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.35.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:35:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:35:30 +0200 Message-ID: To: David Soria Parra Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Make primitive type names reserved words (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] 5.4 features for vote (long)) From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson) On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 20:02, David Soria Parra wrote: > On 2011-07-12, Pierre Joye wrote: >> hi, >> >> As of now I do not think we should allow this change, whether the RFC >> is accepted or not does not matter as it will badly break BC. Unless >> there is a patch allowing this change without affecting existing code >> (main point being namespaced code working smoothly), this RFC should >> be rejected. >> >> Cheers, > > > I think this change has too much of an impact on backward compatibility. > As long as we don't have a concrete implementation, I think we should > let string, int not be reserved words. Argumentes were already presented. > > ps.: Pierre you might want to consider changing your vote in the wiki This thread is an excellent example why attempting to reach consensus by discussing things is important. Voting should be considered as an desperate last resort, not the primary mechanism. http://producingoss.com/en/consensus-democracy.html has several very related points. -Hannes