Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53909 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29202 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2011 08:16:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jul 2011 08:16:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:35638] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 20/A1-07173-ED20C1E4 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:16:31 -0400 Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so2087950gxk.29 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:16:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZC9W6pI0t1WHjzBkkjtcyzaY6FhSDvnU6wLX+pU2CK0=; b=W7xWFz4tVEVC+1ybZQED49x6ZFaI2timS7Rub1XR+Vmr7/iv2xWUSF7jN9lI/yWyvf px7pnaH4mBKHxvFdhVfY34pjvMRKPUYL+HdxgEtK2ETqH0o7BZyjmJSGHfGG0HOdiOsD Mm0hg7vqRUsY9eQBP1mXzVUN8Xb/8TzyIJAn8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.1.36 with SMTP id d36mr1782328yai.2.1310458588432; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.35.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:16:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E1B871C.9090700@sugarcrm.com> References: <4E1B7EE3.7060805@sugarcrm.com> <4E1B871C.9090700@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:16:28 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Kalle Sommer Nielsen , Pierre Joye , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 Alpha 2 From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson) On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:28, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > On 7/11/11 4:20 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: >> >> I agree, it would make more sense to have the votings over before >> doing the next Alpha, so theres time to cook up relevant patches and >> commit them. > > Well, OK, let's say we delay a week. Vote closes on 16th, and I'd have to > pack on 20th, so we get 4 days for people to dust off patches, apply them, > check that everything works, etc. I'm not sure it's worth it - I'd rather > have another alpha - but let's hear what other RFC authors think. I'd say leave the RFC things out for this alpha. Committing to many things in the last days before alpha just increases the risk of it being b0rked. Plus, I'm in Paris for that week so won't be able to commit my proposed changes anyway ;) -Hannes