Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53904 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78357 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2011 23:27:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 23:27:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.170 mail-yx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.170] ([209.85.213.170:52900] helo=mail-yx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9D/64-49578-BC68B1E4 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:27:08 -0400 Received: by yxk8 with SMTP id 8so1971530yxk.29 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:27:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T0Ic9H+n9a+6UMxL5EvU8O4oIU2DXj1jdpsZB4SUxWE=; b=SGjIS4AeXqm7scViT8BFlqJss++IrWf21ldJ2tFTDyfEQqIGnhwfO7BtMn1AByRtPf 7RVxtlc77NCX/Y/TC6r/UvlUpShHs38rSFTJga2mD9xOapQJpHRZ8TVtEFhwiHpEpVe3 IltBV+Gd43gvDOx21LxJBHYa4cpFd+jTHqEIM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.170.4 with SMTP id s4mr4885692ybe.208.1310426825247; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.137.11 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:27:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E1B85D8.50802@sugarcrm.com> References: <4E1B7EE3.7060805@sugarcrm.com> <4E1B85D8.50802@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:27:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 Alpha 2 From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > On 7/11/11 4:16 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> I would rather wait the 2nd wave of RFCs to be adopted/rejected before >> doing a2, if some has no patch (or far to be ready) or too risky (the >> int/string/float looks like one to me) should be dropped and delayed >> to the next release. > > Why delay? RFCs are a separate things, and they should be ready for the > beta. We have a number of features that need testing - webserver, Zend > Signals, XSLT fixes... > We'll have another alpha in early August most probably anyway. If that's the case, well, why not. But if not, we'd to freeze the chosen additions and now rather than later (as per the release RFC). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org