Newsgroups: php.internals,php.webmaster Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53903 php.webmaster:11595 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76654 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2011 23:24:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 23:24:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=philip@roshambo.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=philip@roshambo.org; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain roshambo.org from 209.85.210.170 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: philip@roshambo.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.170 mail-iy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.170] ([209.85.210.170:42320] helo=mail-iy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E0/14-49578-0468B1E4 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:24:48 -0400 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so4616590iym.29 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.130.201 with SMTP id hn9mr222736icc.206.1310426685938; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-174-61-179-13.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [174.61.179.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x11sm1685767ibd.24.2011.07.11.16.24.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:24:42 -0700 Cc: Stas Malyshev , Ferenc Kovacs , Peter Cowburn , Pierre Joye , php-webmaster , PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <8781837B-E770-46CB-B4FB-EF265E2CBD09@roshambo.org> > To: Hannes Magnusson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] sudden spike in wiki registrations From: philip@roshambo.org (Philip Olson) On Jul 11, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 00:34, Stas Malyshev = wrote: >> Hi! >>=20 >> On 7/11/11 3:20 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >>>=20 >>> The idea Stas proposed of leaving the votes untouched and just hide >>> those specific votes during rendering of the vote results is very >>> silly to me. >>> Manually summerizing the votes like has been done in the past on = many >>> RFCs into "with karma" and "without" results would make much more >>> sense to me, especially since there are so many registered votes >>> already. >>=20 >> Well, yes, maybe that'd be even better. If anybody with shell access = could >> get me the raw data files at the end of the vote (should be in = data/meta >> directory with .doodle extension) I could easily write a script that >> summarizes it. >=20 > That won't be a problem. > Matching against SVNROOT/global_avail shouldn't be a problem either to > apply whatever SVN restriction rules needed. The patch fixed a bug where the voting mechanism was not in sync with = the passed voting RFC. It's closer now to most peoples interpretation of = said RFC. Changing this would, I'm afraid, require changing the RFC which I=20= suppose means an amendment [with a new vote] of some sort. I don't know = how bureaucracies work but imagine that'd be what is needed here. Regards, Philip