Newsgroups: php.internals,php.webmaster Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53896 php.webmaster:11592 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63312 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2011 22:35:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 22:35:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.163 smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.163] ([67.192.241.163:46954] helo=smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 91/B1-49578-39A7B1E4 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:35:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7CC2F2701F3; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:34:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 9617127064A; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:34:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E1B7A8F.7090506@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:34:55 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson CC: Ferenc Kovacs , Peter Cowburn , Philip Olson , Pierre Joye , php-webmaster , PHP Internals References: <52B477DE-081D-4ACD-9A14-29514EFFC85D@roshambo.org> <4E1B49F2.2020304@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] sudden spike in wiki registrations From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 7/11/11 3:20 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > The idea Stas proposed of leaving the votes untouched and just hide > those specific votes during rendering of the vote results is very > silly to me. > Manually summerizing the votes like has been done in the past on many > RFCs into "with karma" and "without" results would make much more > sense to me, especially since there are so many registered votes > already. Well, yes, maybe that'd be even better. If anybody with shell access could get me the raw data files at the end of the vote (should be in data/meta directory with .doodle extension) I could easily write a script that summarizes it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227