Newsgroups: php.internals,php.webmaster Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53886 php.webmaster:11582 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32139 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2011 19:07:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 19:07:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.123 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.123 smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.123] ([67.192.241.123:47756] helo=smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AF/84-30857-6F94B1E4 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:07:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 26E472A8138; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:07:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp2.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 89F162A84B5; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:07:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E1B49F2.2020304@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:07:30 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson CC: Philip Olson , Ferenc Kovacs , Pierre Joye , php-webmaster , PHP Internals References: <4E1AB83A.6060801@sugarcrm.com> <52B477DE-081D-4ACD-9A14-29514EFFC85D@roshambo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] sudden spike in wiki registrations From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 7/11/11 11:24 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > The current vote still needs to be reviewed manually anyway, so I > really don't understand the need for a quick hack at this time. > Cooperating with the plugin authors on how to implement better checks > there would imo make much more sense. Is there some API function that allows to see if given username does it have SVN auth? If we have one, we could add check using it to render() maybe for now. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227