Newsgroups: php.internals,php.webmaster Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53850 php.webmaster:11547 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25832 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2011 09:43:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 09:43:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:40199] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 67/3F-41672-BC5CA1E4 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:43:39 -0400 Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so1615350gxk.29 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:43:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=K2jvX3kZIBNPSO2ROlxlVjFCxbMXtKQJDyH5fdgD46o=; b=ehqsPAMk6HjsXKB9t8Czg2SA/+Edaj6BkRUnPMMSOIFlxSewiNoQ47zf5KfvCuXqJ7 LMC+rMxJrJCc3c4pvB1v2LoYBbOvZsc+YOLV7vRNkz1Cu5NuwuPt3UjpRlrYKtFtyacj OMsBEqVlv9ZKmcFVgmSw5L7iFkw6/wbRgHhLA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.0.201 with SMTP id 49mr5108732yhb.114.1310377417028; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.137.11 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:43:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E1AB83A.6060801@sugarcrm.com> References: <4E1AB83A.6060801@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:43:36 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Ferenc Kovacs , php-webmaster , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] sudden spike in wiki registrations From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > I'd say for core features everybody with write access to the core, but then > again, Everyone with @php.net is what was decided. > not sure about how to formalize that. Note that vote isn't meant to > be the decision. At least I think it wasn't and shouldn't mean that. It > should be a measure of if there's a consensus about certain thing or not. Indeed it is a decision. Except for things which can be vetoed due to BC breaks or similar reasons. > As for technical side, I don't know enough about how the auth system works > to see if we can enforce it technically. If somebody with this > knowledge is willing to help, please ping me and we can discuss how to > implement this in docuwiki. I will check that this week, or if anyone else has more free time, pls go ahead. -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org