Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53844 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13114 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2011 08:44:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 08:44:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.203 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.203 smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.203] ([67.192.241.203:38227] helo=smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 99/1D-41672-5E7BA1E4 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:44:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp20.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A3D2F258262; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:44:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp20.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 4FB7B258135; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 04:44:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E1AB7E1.1080907@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:44:17 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4DED3D5B.6030307@oracle.com> <4DEE782E.1020605@sugarcrm.com> <1307489981.23373.31.camel@guybrush> <1307527464.3635.395.camel@guybrush> <1310324547.4669.7.camel@guybrush> <4E1AB3F9.8050009@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Callable type From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 7/11/11 1:38 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > I thought individual RFCs would be voted on first (into trunk), and > then there would be a vote on merging things from trunk. > This sort of heavy voting process is however new to me, will take some > time understanding and getting used to all the new rules around here. Well, this is kind of exceptional, because we had many things that were discussed before we had RFC process and voting process decided on, and we are in the release process. After we've cleaned our plate with this vote, new ones would be individual and according to the new RFC. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227