Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53648 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75074 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2011 10:42:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jun 2011 10:42:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:42683] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D5/B0-05351-7710B0E4 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:42:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29EC710D282; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:41:56 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:41:56 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky To: Stas Malyshev cc: Ferenc Kovacs , David Soria Parra , "internals@lists.php.net" In-Reply-To: <4E0A24E8.6020103@sugarcrm.com> Message-ID: References: <4DFF7898.7010709@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A03AE.40907@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A07FC.4010808@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A181C.7090105@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A24E8.6020103@sugarcrm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 alpha From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: > On 6/28/11 11:35 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > wasn't the alpha1 packaged in the last second? > > it was packaged on Jun 19, and it was planned to be released on Jun 20. > > and it did include obvious bugs. > > No, it was not. It was checked, ensured it builds on all systems I > have access too, etc, and it was done in advance of the release. And > I'm sure it has bugs - as every alpha in the world does. That's why it > is alpha and not final release. The point of alpha is not to provide a > stable platform but initial point for the release and flush out bugs > by expanding the user base. It's not a production release. But it missed the built-in webserver thing :( regards, Derick