Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53629 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33779 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2011 19:01:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jun 2011 19:01:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.183 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.183 smtp183.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.183] ([207.97.245.183:43328] helo=smtp183.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 36/19-18940-CE42A0E4 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:01:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp48.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8190A1688B5; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:00:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp48.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id E07CB1688C4; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:00:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E0A24E8.6020103@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:00:56 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: David Soria Parra , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4DFF7898.7010709@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A03AE.40907@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A07FC.4010808@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A181C.7090105@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 alpha From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 6/28/11 11:35 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > wasn't the alpha1 packaged in the last second? > it was packaged on Jun 19, and it was planned to be released on Jun 20. > and it did include obvious bugs. No, it was not. It was checked, ensured it builds on all systems I have access too, etc, and it was done in advance of the release. And I'm sure it has bugs - as every alpha in the world does. That's why it is alpha and not final release. The point of alpha is not to provide a stable platform but initial point for the release and flush out bugs by expanding the user base. It's not a production release. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227