Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53624 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23326 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2011 18:06:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jun 2011 18:06:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.173 smtp173.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.173] ([207.97.245.173:56971] helo=smtp173.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C8/57-18940-F181A0E4 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:06:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp27.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A5A48118750; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:06:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp27.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 033EE118738; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:06:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E0A181C.7090105@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:06:20 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Philip Olson , Derick Rethans , PHP Internals References: <4DFF7898.7010709@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A03AE.40907@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A07FC.4010808@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A0FEA.9070202@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 alpha From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 6/28/11 10:43 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > I do think we should repackage. There are many issues fixed since last > week and it makes no sense to release something not representing what > the current 5.4 branch is. Really, guys, if we ever want to have scheduled and orderly releases, changing release schedule in the last minute repeatedly and repackaging in the last second is exactly NOT the way to do it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227