Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53622 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18947 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2011 17:43:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jun 2011 17:43:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:49655] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 54/A6-18940-AA21A0E4 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:43:06 -0400 Received: by ywp17 with SMTP id 17so201107ywp.29 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:43:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Dv+eTd4fJ3SjHvIJTowlnqwLzJsFSfNKSl2ZH7Bj/vY=; b=s6SOXsy7dxANhdXdCDWX87erc51WKlsbddZwo/RrWSrvuXBv2FC2o/Dtt/R7vudkyQ iueBg9W/gw/YdmiupEbyPszvlM6Kqk/Janu9WCQ4uU8DlYVyPi5dtBxX4SGfgL75TNTs yMTx0I0OVXXTsR84TLfAVMp8tmHMDB/Qe51wc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.154.97 with SMTP id g61mr747996yhk.265.1309282983674; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.167.16 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:43:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E0A0FEA.9070202@sugarcrm.com> References: <4DFF7898.7010709@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A03AE.40907@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A07FC.4010808@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A0FEA.9070202@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:43:03 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Philip Olson , Derick Rethans , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 alpha From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> Also, it's important to clarify that the [soon-to-be-popular] >> built-in web server is not part of this alpha because the alpha was >> tagged a few days before its addition. I think repackaging would be >> worth it for this case, but waiting for alpha2 is feasible. > > We'll have alpha2 in a month. I'm really not a fan on last minute > repackaging, that's when screw ups happen almost every time. I do think we should repackage. There are many issues fixed since last week and it makes no sense to release something not representing what the current 5.4 branch is. It takes 1h~ to do it, no big deal. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org