Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53620 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15316 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2011 17:28:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jun 2011 17:28:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=philip@roshambo.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=philip@roshambo.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain roshambo.org from 209.85.210.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: philip@roshambo.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.42 mail-pz0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.42] ([209.85.210.42:45098] helo=mail-pz0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1D/F5-18940-D2F0A0E4 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:28:14 -0400 Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so324630pzk.29 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.33.195 with SMTP id t3mr3931840pbi.58.1309282090707; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-174-61-179-13.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [174.61.179.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5sm263958pbd.92.2011.06.28.10.28.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4E0A07FC.4010808@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:28:08 -0700 Cc: Derick Rethans , PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <4DFF7898.7010709@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A03AE.40907@sugarcrm.com> <4E0A07FC.4010808@sugarcrm.com> To: Stas Malyshev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 alpha From: philip@roshambo.org (Philip Olson) On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! >=20 > On 6/28/11 9:55 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: >>=20 >> I'm actually surprised it isn't in there. I did write that document >> some eons ago. But anyway, let's add it then :) >=20 > OK, as soon as we are all agreed on Thursday and it's there I'll shift = the schedule for next releases so it'll actually be on Thursday, though = I'm not sure why would it actually matter :) The day an alpha/beta is released doesn't feel important, unlike stable = releases, but I suppose consistency has its good points. :) I think the = main point is to wait for bugs.php.net, which is making real progress = and should be available Thursday. Also, it's important to clarify that the [soon-to-be-popular] built-in = web server is not part of this alpha because the alpha was tagged a few = days before its addition. I think repackaging would be worth it for this = case, but waiting for alpha2 is feasible. Regards, Philip