Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:5362 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76604 invoked by uid 1010); 11 Nov 2003 22:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76580 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2003 22:50:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tabini.ca) (198.63.211.18) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2003 22:50:45 -0000 Received: from cpe0080c80c4893-cm013439900542.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([24.156.158.54] helo=tabini.ca) by tabini.ca with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.22) id 1AJhOL-0001Mv-Ay; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:53:45 -0600 Message-ID: <3FB167DA.4070606@tabini.ca> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:51:06 -0500 Organization: Marco Tabini & Associates, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031023 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Gutmans CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <5.1.0.14.2.20031111195356.04d4e420@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20031111195356.04d4e420@127.0.0.1> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.81.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1 From: marcot@tabini.ca (Marco Tabini) Sorry to interject, but shouldn't the feature set be frozen before moving to a release candidate? This stage should mean to people that they can start building software on the new system because all the features are fixed and are not going to change, even though the system may still have bugs and is not yet production ready (in fact, that's what beta should mean, but there was no alpha, so...). Cheers, Marco Andi Gutmans wrote: > Hey guys, > > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release an RC. > I think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at > the former date. > Are there any major (as in "major") issues which in your opinion still > need to be dealt with? > > Thanks, > Andi >