Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53617
Return-Path: <derick@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 6873 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2011 16:55:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jun 2011 16:55:49 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6
Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:49553] helo=xdebug.org)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E8/64-18940-3970A0E4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:55:48 -0400
Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1])
	by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97336DE144;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:55:44 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:55:44 +0100 (BST)
X-X-Sender: derick@whisky
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E0A03AE.40907@sugarcrm.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106281752450.3774@whisky>
References: <4DFF7898.7010709@sugarcrm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106281143110.3774@whisky> <4E0A03AE.40907@sugarcrm.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 alpha
From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans)

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote:

> > I would also like to point out that Thursday is our general release day,
> > and we have a release process described in detail here:
> > http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/README.RELEASE_PROCESS?revision=311614&view=markup
> 
> It doesn't say there Thursday is our general release day. If we want 
> to make it so - ok, let's everybody agree on that and put it there.

I'm actually surprised it isn't in there. I did write that document 
some eons ago. But anyway, let's add it then :)

cheers,
Derick