Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53602
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=PFGon94vrOE5oovC4kjeAb5vFUybWp6AZA5hYu7oMHU8E4+AZOK1dzZ6bZl1gIZCnm
         FZV6KhuHFEIRjFzfKutwYXZp1RfZRGzHi7lUKnkDZbdTjGvfXG8oqXR1tlrUVxfWxt00
         kuC+y/Ufku/JPWR+TLOmiI+AY0R26eiancsAk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimzuyArKMk5VGSZ9JnkzJPoXz8iyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=Kbbv_Vt9zb+e3faoUqUWekDr8Gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikWE4xdJs7UnX3ZfcyVO3KrxP+jLg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinUPizFtNR2SeiCtsbwyVB2SUQUHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTik6KaHhY+RvTYY5+DEphsGWrekPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=PE_HVbbv6NtjAK=pCdtAdkTXTyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinAz-ZNK0SXVp_RNhkujUcFNgma6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E07FE98.9080002@garfieldtech.com>
	<BANLkTimzuyArKMk5VGSZ9JnkzJPoXz8iyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:01:57 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTinPOcfX2KwXsFUmiagbW-hM4BEJAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Object oriented session handlers
From: arraypad@gmail.com (Arpad Ray)

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Arpad Ray <arraypad@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> =
wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused. =A0If the session handler goes out of its way to ens=
ure
>> that it's the last thing to run, wouldn't that cause an issue if it trie=
s to
>> write session data after, say, the database connection object it wants t=
o
>> use has already been cleaned up? =A0Or is that the use case for the "do =
not
>> register" parameter? =A0It seems like it would be a fairly common use ca=
se...
>>
>
> If the database object isn't manually cleaned up (all references to it
> are unset) then that will take place in the second stage of the
> request shutdown process, whereas the first stage is running the
> shutdown functions, so that shouldn't be an issue.
>
> The most common use case for the second argument is where the user
> already calls session_write_close() (probably in their own shutdown
> function) and doesn't reopen it - it's then useless for us to register
> and call our shutdown function.
>
> Regards,
>
> Arpad
>

Oops, CCing the list again.