Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:5352 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83822 invoked by uid 1010); 11 Nov 2003 21:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83753 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2003 21:47:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.zend.com) (192.117.235.230) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2003 21:47:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2755 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2003 21:47:18 -0000 Received: from guardian.zend.office (HELO andi-laptop.zend.com) (10.1.1.4) by int.zend.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2003 21:47:18 -0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20031111234519.063a95f0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: andi@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:47:17 +0200 To: , In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20031111195356.04d4e420@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1 From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) At 10:39 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, Wolfgang Drews wrote: >*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* >Hi, > > > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release > > an RC. I > > think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the > > former date. > > Are there any major (as in "major") issues which in your > > opinion still need to be dealt with? > >i would suggest to wait with RCs and go on with beta-releases. The big >problem with >php5 is, that most of the php-"user" do not know exactly what will change, >what php5 >will do better/different and what they will have to change within their >applications. >In my opinion there are two reasons for it: > >1.) far to less communication >2.) far to less documentation > >these points make it really difficult for the normal developer to migrate to >php5. >Well, you can say now there are lots of articles around, explaining this and >that, >but this is only one point. The most important thing is imho putting these >infos >into the official docs. And - maybe Zend can help here - to enforce the >communication >of php5 and it's features (i.e. pay some good people to write an >extra-column on >zend-website, php-website and wellknow php-portals around the world, >introducing >STEP BY STEP and CONTINUOUSLY the new php5-features, ...). I would call this >a >campaign. I agree. I think we need to take care of this. I wouldn't count on any one company for this (although this is also important). How about the people from internals@ who made changes volunteer to write about their changes? >I understand you at zend wish to enforce speed in release of php5, but think >about >"preparing the users for it" and "make it stable" Actually it's more of a personal ambition. Andi