Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53467 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 3196 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2011 10:16:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2011 10:16:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:38272] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FA/E2-18727-99F600E4 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:16:57 -0400 Received: by ywp17 with SMTP id 17so2976701ywp.29 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=q0g6t6CgL5d0vE+DL2ZWr1fTgdkANpFvgR7vhGN8yRY=; b=KHY6RhOdfqp0ZIqcOE5ndngbYJUFajZPUf2iZ89xC1j628EyBMKfT0AcdSv8d7M9Bh UTD9ksPcQmJfn/AJ4aLn7jsAe0lm/Xp94ozKbslPWPheQpFAzHO55Cyj61juM5mQb3LO +XLrafeH7vg76q96wjIXfeIfOSexjF/B5yZ6U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CRZJkwu8UoFbAEVRM35ODW01CNEcoGTpJGu/o2pMgzI7u6ImuFLFXbo3Z/SGHkDIjS 9DY+yJkK9nhgtkwJPmLy+Fzn0gim6Qj9iq2Jj6s/yxnZkhPohVNLkZkgjyElR9UUaYIs pzYBmXQyGc/4jlGZQeACSIFOky/Az90vHBeUE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.116.41 with SMTP id f29mr7450231yhh.30.1308651414577; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.170.17 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E001057.4060905@php.net> References: <4E001057.4060905@php.net> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:16:54 +0200 Message-ID: To: Sebastian Bergmann Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Can't vote yet, as RFC has "options" (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] release process RFC) From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wro= te: > Am 20.06.2011 15:30, schrieb Derick Rethans: >> I am not generally against this RFC, but this point needs to be >> discussed first IMO. As having 5 active branches at the same time for >> the "multiple major releases" option is *not* workable. > > =A0I agree. That's why we added a couple of notices about 12 or 18 months. It is also very unlikely that we end we end in such situations anyway.And even if we do, given the strictness (about what can be applied), We didn't see much of a problem here. Cheers, --=20 Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org