Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53462 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86910 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2011 08:23:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2011 08:23:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.42 mail-yi0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.42] ([209.85.218.42:62257] helo=mail-yi0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 71/60-18727-305500E4 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:23:31 -0400 Received: by yih10 with SMTP id 10so2944917yih.29 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:23:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=T1Gc/tcDKl1KSKNJsg2ZsGhCx1I49dZoquhEvNVa38E=; b=wu3+6vVA69q0EBCNNQHuwL4zwB9nAfCVxJ/y5kzP2ZzqZMpiqAooTUqSvRXMF25KUG RSNngwPdkT2U0p3tvL9GrPvZOKoZ7o7OEiol2XMcDPgHvHNspEjyOFN9kc5mzUGjBWcv OtpVg3EDnwdL0ugSL3WcmrBkAs+D7XMuaEC6M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VwvxFjOjRqnKd5Yr2ErEb+SiIx6pI29NH2S+X/YYt2PcR2H9yhCxWWXIKRaZibGeAy Xf4G43sbmqYfmKOj8j3nUN8SjihtHbT2w8pb37PcekmYgfixyMDs/jHNMQNsYRfajn3+ f+/PMimPYXeXI6FIZyQiWT1mp7lzRwG6slo9Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.138.161 with SMTP id a21mr8553494yhj.49.1308644608270; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.99.11 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:23:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1308584208.6296.9.camel@guybrush> <1308586150.6296.13.camel@guybrush> <1308589044.8394.27.camel@inspiron> <4DFF7E2A.50506@sugarcrm.com> <1308591260.8394.47.camel@inspiron> <1308605224.7135.2.camel@guybrush> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:23:28 +0200 Message-ID: To: Robert Eisele Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= , Todd Ruth , Stas Malyshev , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303b40cf03611804a634916d Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: foreach() for strings From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --20cf303b40cf03611804a634916d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2011/6/21 Robert Eisele > And what actually failed? The idea seams straightforward. > > Robert > > http://www.slideshare.net/andreizm/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-what-happened-to-unicode-and-php-6 to my understanding: in retrospective the utf-16 wasn't the best idea, it caused more conversion that it seemed necessary beforehand, and many of the core devs lacked the vison and/or the technical knowledge about the unicode stuff, the adoption of the support for unicode strings was much slower than expected. Tyrael --20cf303b40cf03611804a634916d--