Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53432 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43129 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2011 16:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2011 16:58:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:34975] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8D/FE-34681-E2C7FFD4 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:58:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp9.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CDAA13C058D; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:58:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp9.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 86CF23C028A; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:58:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DFF7C28.30100@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:58:16 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Eisele CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Changed behaviour for strtr() From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Here is the next one. > > I think it's quite intuitive to use strtr() to remove single characters of a > string, too, instead of using many str_replace($str, $chr, ""). I'd glad to > see this change also in 5.4. This is a BC break, if I understand it correctly, so I don't think it is a good idea. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227