Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53430 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40847 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2011 16:54:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2011 16:54:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:51517] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FC/7E-34681-B5B7FFD4 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:54:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp9.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3F2043C020F; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:54:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp9.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id DCFA73C04A1; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:54:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DFF7B58.7070902@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:54:48 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Etienne Kneuss CC: PHP Internals References: <4DFA7EDF.5050802@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] 5.4 features for vote (long) From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I'd love to see the proposal from Felipe about the improved parse > errors in that list. I believe that the patch was ready or almost > ready? I can't find the RFC though, but maybe the RFC never existed... Thanks, missed it. I think based on the discussion and wide acceptance we could put it on the TODO. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227