Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53410
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=gRRQjSU2VGgzmfmcPV+IY66wyeTRWTKaGoTUU92HC7swu5Jl+SJyKlJRDkeUXhaAo+
         i1MpafR2PR3RTS5kOtxUKmd2qE7Q5mxPlPuEYFPSpYXV7/WTODz2+PoW2mIn+w9cav09
         ZVfavX1RR8LnVnUgL/qUXxKt0EH0qHb5/A3+4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: ekneuss@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <4DFA7EDF.5050802@sugarcrm.com>
References: <4DFA7EDF.5050802@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:47:53 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinKnxk=1zeUCNKV4vOTJFVN_uUsxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] 5.4 features for vote (long)
From: colder@php.net (Etienne Kneuss)

Hi,


On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 00:08, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Below is the list of the features proposed for inclusion in 5.4, as outlined
> in https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54. Please read the TODO page and the RFCs
> linked there for details.
> This mail is not a vote call but rather description of things that will be
> put to vote soon. For each one, I'd like to see that:
>
> a. It is clear to everybody what is being proposed. If you have any doubts
> or see that it needs further discussion, please tell.
>
> b. We didn't miss something. If you have a proposal that has RFC in good
> shape, patch (or can have patch within 1 month from now) and you think has
> to be in 5.4 and has good chance for community support, please tell.

I'd love to see the proposal from Felipe about the improved parse
errors in that list. I believe that the patch was ready or almost
ready? I can't find the RFC though, but maybe the RFC never existed...

Best,

-- 
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch