Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53358
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=k0y1MeHSw6/a/wwGJdiNyyf1ZIEsgR/0htdEfpqDzL5sjd/mQHFb1GUR9gmjwVS6xx
         lLMTdT15UxhEdRU6nLCTQ5nShckVXZczu824I3VssPzlhx337JkO18QQHFuam3VVBSwr
         Ux85OpL51c9dJYf9rFqNo/URpj3Ey6yCTGlV0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106171753340.4180@whisky>
References: <4DFA96ED.90800@sugarcrm.com>
	<BANLkTinO3dy+CKnFECLsQtH9YPGwAjsGGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DFB6C69.4040702@sugarcrm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1106171613330.4180@whisky>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1106171753340.4180@whisky>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:11:53 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTin9omWcmfb9KH+wnhrGWofHbNu=-mLo5iZnBDgEbaWtVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, "RQuadling@GMail.com" <RQuadling@gmail.com>, 
	PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] date_diff broken?
From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson)

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 18:54, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>>
>> > > If either of the dates use a TLA timezone (EDT, PST, GMT), rather
>> > > than the long name (Europe/London, Indian/Kerguelen,
>> > > America/Kentucky/Louisville), then that date is altered.
>> >
>> > Yes, this seems to be because TLA ones rely on ->z and ->dst which get
>> > reset in timelib_unixtime2gmt() while other one relies on tzinfo which
>> > is kept intact.
>>
>> Yup. I'm fixing it right now.
>
> Done... I had to do it by making a backup for now. It should be looked
> at again though, and I've added that to my (long) todo list.

Does it mean that all the tests Daniel added should work now?
http://news.php.net/php.cvs/65174

-Hannes