Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53290 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86721 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2011 07:24:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Jun 2011 07:24:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.153 smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.153] ([67.192.241.153:39066] helo=smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D5/65-39503-A1E58FD4 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:24:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp15.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 02F6030074E; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:24:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp15.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id A8073300732; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:24:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DF85E17.3080700@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:24:07 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Gutmans CC: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9014CE547@US-EX2.zend.net> In-Reply-To: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9014CE547@US-EX2.zend.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 5.4 alpha, was: [PHP-DEV] Give the Language a Rest motion (fwd) From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Stas, on a different note, weren't we going to roll a 5.4 alpha? I was going to write about it soon, but since you asked: I was waiting for RFC/voting discussion and vote in hope that we could get it all ready before the alpha, but it looks like it is taking longer than expected. So I think maybe we can have the alpha before that - and the RFC says we should have alpha in June anyway, and June is already half-gone :) The original plan was this week, so maybe this Thursday? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227