Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53249
Return-Path: <johannes@schlueters.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 58423 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2011 17:02:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2011 17:02:58 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 ns.km36107.keymachine.de  
Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:53954] helo=config.schlueters.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id CD/4D-54720-14E42FD4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:02:58 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.230] (ppp-93-104-53-99.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.53.99])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B53E772AD3;
	Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:02:52 +0200 (CEST)
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, Hannes Landeholm
 <landeholm@gmail.com>, PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106101750470.5202@whisky>
References: <BANLkTi=4xSewB9QNd1YAsE6bqKzU4HiF5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106101542090.5202@whisky> <4DF24AA1.4070907@sugarcrm.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106101750470.5202@whisky>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:02:48 +0200
Message-ID: <1307725368.3269.548.camel@guybrush>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 32 bit / 64 bit integer confusion
From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=)

On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 17:52 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Yes, indeed. That was a typo. The original point still stands though. 
> And IMO, this should be fixed in the Windows port so that on 64 bit 
> processors, the PHP "int" type (the C "long" type) is actually 64 bits, 
> just like almost any other current operating system/compiler set-up.

While this will cause "strange" behavior when using "large" integers
with some of our extension functions calling some c lib ...

imagecreate(42949323647, 21444347483647);

as a random example. (assuming one has enough ram ;-) )

johannes