Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53243 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39195 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2011 14:51:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2011 14:51:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:39828] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CD/7A-54720-C8F22FD4 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:51:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EA73DE143; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:51:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:51:53 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky To: Hannes Landeholm cc: PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 32 bit / 64 bit integer confusion From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Richard Riley wrote: > Hannes Landeholm writes: > > *snip button* > > Could anyone suggest why the php groups in particular mark post mime types > incorrectly in certain instances? I am seeing > > ,---- > | Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301d426efd027f04a55b14cc > `---- > > when there is only a single text part. Its playing havoc with my Gnus > set up ;) I am viewing through gmane but dont have this elsewhere. > > Or is it just the posters themselves with incorrectly configured > posting/email clients? Yes, I think so. It's also not *incorrect*. It's perfectly acceptable to have a multipart/alternative with just one part. Derick