Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53227
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 85407 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2011 09:25:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2011 09:25:48 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.170 mail-vx0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.170] ([209.85.220.170:34885] helo=mail-vx0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 78/92-54720-C13E1FD4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:25:48 -0400
Received: by vxb40 with SMTP id 40so2257752vxb.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=KDI6HZeOsnTipfIMRnWm9RBYcx/OaMKJqQqshSF2vjk=;
        b=Y31yXlVn1IrdkBpYGYECw9MVpx5UH5ttvGUtiSEmajI0YHsF316sPorjJ/b5T9epHE
         wCTPxzMI9LtXnUIEXO4FfB6o+/3CmIEUeDeom0ria+sVMoc4EXjN4K/kG6ldSmdlPdz3
         aklr5MG0Q9S4PyPuPhNkDhJx+nl2a1nkEz/4g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=o8lx4xLu5yzWCZ+KxJaBu5rQcriBqmLAS6g4FuqdqyV7flANqsiZZmylohO2Vrzq8a
         3s09VwlzDj7LJdPc3/+fGtTuJR7cV9lQMQhF0mHjXbWcOqlWcDdb0TwU1DpmjVEInV7v
         HMteTe/wfeDTY08m2bp48C+OJZb98mAZYN2Lo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.138.199 with SMTP id a47mr2528940yhj.64.1307697945431;
 Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.147.168.18 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29.10.00968.DDC01FD4@pb1.pair.com>
References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net>
	<BANLkTikau4c4-HzkGAXG15AMS2tr6fe+NA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DEB6A80.9030406@thelounge.net>
	<29.10.00968.DDC01FD4@pb1.pair.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:25:45 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimLLUVOVKRq3X4coeAik+DR+U_4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303ea87682cd9404a55827c9
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bundling "modern" extensions
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--20cf303ea87682cd9404a55827c9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 9 Jun 2011 20:11, "Michael Wallner" <mike@php.net> wrote:

> I started the rewrite of the extension, because it had one really big
> drawback, namely that message bodies where implemented as memory chunk
> instead of streams. The next major headache caused the confusion which
> the HttpResponse class was responsible for. Another major addition will
> be the choice of request handling library http\Request should use.
> libcurl, neon and serf are on the table currently.

I'd to strongly suggest to keep using libcurl, it is the most well
maintained and OSS-friendly library. It also happens to be very closed to
the standard, in this http.


Cheers,

--20cf303ea87682cd9404a55827c9--