Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53226
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain thelounge.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4DF1E1DD.2020601@thelounge.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:20:29 +0200
Organization: the lounge interactive design
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net>	<BANLkTikau4c4-HzkGAXG15AMS2tr6fe+NA@mail.gmail.com>	<4DEB6A80.9030406@thelounge.net> <29.10.00968.DDC01FD4@pb1.pair.com>
In-Reply-To: <29.10.00968.DDC01FD4@pb1.pair.com>
OpenPGP: id=7F780279;
	url=http://arrakis.thelounge.net/gpg/h.reindl_thelounge.net.pub.txt
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigDAC7AE88BDDCA5309AA40F16"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bundling "modern" extensions
From: h.reindl@thelounge.net (Reindl Harald)

--------------enigDAC7AE88BDDCA5309AA40F16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Am 09.06.2011 20:11, schrieb Michael Wallner:
> In the past many developers did not feel comfy enough with the pecl_htt=
p=20
> extension.  It had been proposed for inclusion in the core distribution=
=20
> for a few times, but people always had doubts about the API etc.

i do not understand why

> Another major addition will be the choice of request handling library h=
ttp\Request=20
> should use. libcurl, neon and serf are on the table currently.

sounds like php-namespaces are introduced here
even for people usig them NOT becuase of the braindead \

> Anyway, if people want to take part in architecting the future of this =

> extension, they are more than welcome.
>=20
> I already invited you to participate, but you did not answer

what want you hear from me?

let the api fuck in peace or you risk that the extension will not used
in the future because you force all users to totally change their project=
s with
the fear that 5 years later 3.0.0 breaks all baackward compatibility agai=
n


--------------enigDAC7AE88BDDCA5309AA40F16
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3x4d0ACgkQhmBjz394AnnbQQCfaFr3x1y0WgD8R6IdGYv65O1N
LFoAn2MN7Holq/Jzg5ZmEr4U8l1ckkq+
=I8I9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigDAC7AE88BDDCA5309AA40F16--